<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are We Ready to Add Cause to Social Check-Ins?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fredmcclimans.com/2011/08/01/adding-cause-to-the-social-check-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fredmcclimans.com/2011/08/01/adding-cause-to-the-social-check-in/</link>
	<description>analysis - innovation - execution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:47:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking Forward To 2012 &#124; Intelligent Catalyst</title>
		<link>http://fredmcclimans.com/2011/08/01/adding-cause-to-the-social-check-in/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Looking Forward To 2012 &#124; Intelligent Catalyst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 02:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredmcclimans.com/?p=775#comment-398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Are We Ready to Add Cause to Social Check-Ins? (fredmcclimans.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Are We Ready to Add Cause to Social Check-Ins? (fredmcclimans.com) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let&#8217;s Call It What It Is: Pervasive Communication</title>
		<link>http://fredmcclimans.com/2011/08/01/adding-cause-to-the-social-check-in/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s Call It What It Is: Pervasive Communication]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredmcclimans.com/?p=775#comment-326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Are We Ready to Add Cause to Social Check-Ins? (fredmcclimans.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Are We Ready to Add Cause to Social Check-Ins? (fredmcclimans.com) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://fredmcclimans.com/2011/08/01/adding-cause-to-the-social-check-in/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredmcclimans.com/?p=775#comment-319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, I&#039;ll specify that having lived in the mountains for a handful of years, I was technologically stunted (although I ran two blogs and a paid marketing company on Google Groups). Since returning to the real world I was slow to get in and now find my perfectly good blackberry to be a glorified rotary dial grandma phone with a typewriter function. And when I first tried 4square, I couldn&#039;t get into it. I don&#039;t use Facebook either evidencing my viewpoint not meaning necessarily anything bad for a company. That being said, here&#039;s my point/counterpoint.

I agree on the efficacy of such use for many social media platforms. If the sometimes comedic, sometimes dangerous Flash Mobs are possible, Flash Caring shouldn&#039;t be that much harder. If I just coined a phrase, I would like to trademark that now. I&#039;m no Einstein and thereby lack the patent office insider info to get it done right now, so you can just act as my back up once it&#039;s stolen.

The disagreement is why 4square? Why not hit up elance.com for a programmer to throw together your framework and start from &quot;scratch&quot; (quotes are only being used since I don&#039;t personally believe in reinventing the wheel and most of the work is done for you). BOOM! FredSquare.com is born.There&#039;s probably a better name but its&#039; a little catchy.

Anyway, the entire model can be the same as 4square for the most part (especially from a mobile aspect) and since it&#039;s about charity and caring, throw in a feature like Caringbridge.com to let people tell their story and promote each cause to their email lists of friends and family for you. Throw out all the &quot;check-ins&quot; for the sake of &quot;check-ins&quot;. I don&#039;t care that Johnny is Mayor of Haagen Daas in in Bronxville unless they&#039;re raising money for something. 

Maybe I&#039;ve said too much. Do you have a link to start up VC firms?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I&#8217;ll specify that having lived in the mountains for a handful of years, I was technologically stunted (although I ran two blogs and a paid marketing company on Google Groups). Since returning to the real world I was slow to get in and now find my perfectly good blackberry to be a glorified rotary dial grandma phone with a typewriter function. And when I first tried 4square, I couldn&#8217;t get into it. I don&#8217;t use Facebook either evidencing my viewpoint not meaning necessarily anything bad for a company. That being said, here&#8217;s my point/counterpoint.</p>
<p>I agree on the efficacy of such use for many social media platforms. If the sometimes comedic, sometimes dangerous Flash Mobs are possible, Flash Caring shouldn&#8217;t be that much harder. If I just coined a phrase, I would like to trademark that now. I&#8217;m no Einstein and thereby lack the patent office insider info to get it done right now, so you can just act as my back up once it&#8217;s stolen.</p>
<p>The disagreement is why 4square? Why not hit up elance.com for a programmer to throw together your framework and start from &#8220;scratch&#8221; (quotes are only being used since I don&#8217;t personally believe in reinventing the wheel and most of the work is done for you). BOOM! FredSquare.com is born.There&#8217;s probably a better name but its&#8217; a little catchy.</p>
<p>Anyway, the entire model can be the same as 4square for the most part (especially from a mobile aspect) and since it&#8217;s about charity and caring, throw in a feature like Caringbridge.com to let people tell their story and promote each cause to their email lists of friends and family for you. Throw out all the &#8220;check-ins&#8221; for the sake of &#8220;check-ins&#8221;. I don&#8217;t care that Johnny is Mayor of Haagen Daas in in Bronxville unless they&#8217;re raising money for something. </p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ve said too much. Do you have a link to start up VC firms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse de Agustin</title>
		<link>http://fredmcclimans.com/2011/08/01/adding-cause-to-the-social-check-in/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse de Agustin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredmcclimans.com/?p=775#comment-314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Fred,
I think of one &quot;checking in&quot; by means of saying &quot;I&#039;m here and here is why&quot; as some kind of justification for said &quot;check in&quot; that is expressed through the social media landscape. I can also see this evolving to different instances - i.e. kids don&#039;t tell their parents they&#039;ve found their friends at the movies, they simply &quot;check in&quot;, provide justification and parents are notified like any other FourSquare check-in! I&#039;m sure some parents would feel the &quot;human&quot; element of &quot;communication&quot; with their kids has gone awry. (Even though, according to &quot;communications theory&quot; the kids are still communicating.)

I do think your argument can evolve the check in - my only concern is that when people check in it seems that it is a &quot;stream of consciousness&quot; type of thinking. Currently people don&#039;t seem to (initially) tweet about why they&#039;re checking in to a location.....maybe they want food....I&#039;ll see people check in, (post to twitter) and subsequent tweets will give justification as to why they&#039;re there. Having people check in &quot;remotely&quot; is an interesting idea - perhaps we&#039;d need a way to differentiate those who are &quot;there&quot; (for support, but not physically at the event) and those who are actually there. I can definitely see those who are at the event &quot;remotely&quot; contributing to a cause. 

But creating &quot;locations&quot; from events, or causes can provide a resonating &quot;call to action&quot; and a meaningful way for people to provide justification for why they are at a particular place - and make that social event even more memorable - through interactions with people at different vantage points. 

-Jesse
 
http://www.about.me/jesse7
linkedin.com/in/jessedeagustin  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Fred,<br />
I think of one &#8220;checking in&#8221; by means of saying &#8220;I&#8217;m here and here is why&#8221; as some kind of justification for said &#8220;check in&#8221; that is expressed through the social media landscape. I can also see this evolving to different instances &#8211; i.e. kids don&#8217;t tell their parents they&#8217;ve found their friends at the movies, they simply &#8220;check in&#8221;, provide justification and parents are notified like any other FourSquare check-in! I&#8217;m sure some parents would feel the &#8220;human&#8221; element of &#8220;communication&#8221; with their kids has gone awry. (Even though, according to &#8220;communications theory&#8221; the kids are still communicating.)</p>
<p>I do think your argument can evolve the check in &#8211; my only concern is that when people check in it seems that it is a &#8220;stream of consciousness&#8221; type of thinking. Currently people don&#8217;t seem to (initially) tweet about why they&#8217;re checking in to a location&#8230;..maybe they want food&#8230;.I&#8217;ll see people check in, (post to twitter) and subsequent tweets will give justification as to why they&#8217;re there. Having people check in &#8220;remotely&#8221; is an interesting idea &#8211; perhaps we&#8217;d need a way to differentiate those who are &#8220;there&#8221; (for support, but not physically at the event) and those who are actually there. I can definitely see those who are at the event &#8220;remotely&#8221; contributing to a cause. </p>
<p>But creating &#8220;locations&#8221; from events, or causes can provide a resonating &#8220;call to action&#8221; and a meaningful way for people to provide justification for why they are at a particular place &#8211; and make that social event even more memorable &#8211; through interactions with people at different vantage points. </p>
<p>-Jesse<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.about.me/jesse7" rel="nofollow">http://www.about.me/jesse7</a><br />
linkedin.com/in/jessedeagustin  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turn On, Check In, Hang Out</title>
		<link>http://fredmcclimans.com/2011/08/01/adding-cause-to-the-social-check-in/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Turn On, Check In, Hang Out]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredmcclimans.com/?p=775#comment-312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I had with Fred McClimans of the McClimans Group. Check out Fred’s most recent post &#8220;Are We Ready to Add Cause to Social Check-Ins?&#8221; to get a sense of the evolution of social [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I had with Fred McClimans of the McClimans Group. Check out Fred’s most recent post &#8220;Are We Ready to Add Cause to Social Check-Ins?&#8221; to get a sense of the evolution of social [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
