<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fredmcclimans.com &#187; Alan Berkson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fredmcclimans.com/tag/alan-berkson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fredmcclimans.com</link>
	<description>analysis - innovation - execution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:26:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>PERSPECTIVES 003: Social Business w Chris Heuer</title>
		<link>http://fredmcclimans.com/2013/11/02/perspectives-003-social-business/</link>
		<comments>http://fredmcclimans.com/2013/11/02/perspectives-003-social-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 21:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred McClimans]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Berkson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris heuer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pivotcon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredmcclimans.com/?p=1339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Heuer and Alan Berkson join me as they share their perspectives on Social Business – Recorded at #PivotCon 2013.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fredmcclimans.com/2013/11/02/perspectives-003-social-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Klout, Big Data and the Meaning of &#8220;Opt Out&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://fredmcclimans.com/2012/05/01/klout-big-data-and-the-meaning-of-opt-out/</link>
		<comments>http://fredmcclimans.com/2012/05/01/klout-big-data-and-the-meaning-of-opt-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 23:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred McClimans]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Berkson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fred mcclimans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InflenceChat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremiah Owyang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PeerIndex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pervasive communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sam fiorella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparenty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TweetLevel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitalyzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredmcclimans.com/?p=939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it possible to have a Klout Score of Zero (K = 0)? Why, you might ask, would anybody want to have such a score in the gamified realm of influence measurement, where higher scores indicate a higher level of perceived online influence? The answer may lie in the way that Klout profiles you, branding [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fredmcclimans.com/2012/05/01/klout-big-data-and-the-meaning-of-opt-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disruption and Innovation, Part I</title>
		<link>http://fredmcclimans.com/2012/04/01/disruption-and-innovation-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://fredmcclimans.com/2012/04/01/disruption-and-innovation-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred McClimans]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Berkson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brian reich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disruptive innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredmcclimans.com/?p=915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the years, as an analyst, advisor and even as an entrepreneur, I’ve heard the phrase “Our strategy is to disrupt ” far too often. It’s a bit disheartening at times, because what I really want to hear is how your strategy is going to “innovate” rather than disrupt. Why? I’ve always believed that the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fredmcclimans.com/2012/04/01/disruption-and-innovation-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mentoring, Networking and Innovation – Revisited</title>
		<link>http://fredmcclimans.com/2011/10/24/mentoring-networking-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://fredmcclimans.com/2011/10/24/mentoring-networking-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred McClimans]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Berkson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apprenticeships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competitive advantage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explicit knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fred mcclimans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generation y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hyper-connected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge acquisition ecosystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mentor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mentoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pervasive communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tacit knowledge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredmcclimans.com/?p=855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History is filled with examples of linkages between networking, mentoring and innovation, but over the centuries the knowledge acquisition ecosystem has changed considerably. There was a time when this process was slow and rooted in tacit knowledge, but as the needs and wants of society progressed and evolved, the process became more refined—moving faster— and rooted in the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fredmcclimans.com/2011/10/24/mentoring-networking-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Properties of Influence You Need to Understand</title>
		<link>http://fredmcclimans.com/2011/07/26/5-properties-of-influence-you-need-to-understand/</link>
		<comments>http://fredmcclimans.com/2011/07/26/5-properties-of-influence-you-need-to-understand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred McClimans]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aerosmith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Berkson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlton Heston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligist Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Welch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johannes Gutenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Gerstner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[positive influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hot Chili Peppers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Orbison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RunDMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam elliot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Hawking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yul Brenner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredmcclimans.com/?p=770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a great deal of discussion of late regarding influence, most of it centered around who has it, how to measure it and how to leverage it. So when I sat down with my good friend and colleague Alan Berkson (@berkson0) of the Intelligist Group to discuss influence, we decided to push each [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fredmcclimans.com/2011/07/26/5-properties-of-influence-you-need-to-understand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
